Major defence procurements are supposed to get the Canadian Armed Forces the right gear quickly while yielding domestic work and goods sales, but there’s no system for weighing those priorities, the federal procurement ombudsman found in a newly released report. (The Logic)
Talking point: The government entities involved often disagree about how to manage competing demands, especially when the Innovation Department isn’t consulted until late in the process but has economic-benefits demands, procurement ombud Alexander Jeglic reported. Big procurements also go through painful reviews by the Treasury Board (which has “an overactive challenge function”) and can be handled throughout by people who lack key expertise, Jeglic found. Without correction, these long-standing problems will get in the way of revitalizing and re-equipping the military while meeting national defence spending targets, the report said.
Loading...
You have shared 5 articles this month and reached the maximum amount of shares available.
CloseIf you would like to purchase a sharing license please contact The Logic support at [email protected].
CloseYou have gifted 0 article(s) this month and have 5 remaining.
Recipients will be able to read the full text of the article after submitting their email address. They will not have access to other articles or subscriber benefits.
Get up to speed in minutes with insights and analysis on the most important stories of the day, every weekday.
See the bigger picture with reporters and industry experts in subscriber-exclusive events.
Membership provides access to our popular Slack channel, participation in subscriber surveys and invitations to exclusive events with our journalists and special guests.